Posts Tagged ‘return on influence’

Sales 2.0 Merges Sales and Marketing

Wednesday, July 7th, 2010

I’ve been watching this coming for a long time, and I believe it’s really here now… and it’s a massive opportunity for SMBs (or SMEs for my Euro and Asian friends). Sales 2.0 finally does away with the ineffective and inefficient sales tactics that so many SMBs continue to use (as if they’re on auto-pilot). Cold calling and ABC (Always Be Closing) have been dead for years, it’s high time we gave them a decent burial.Sales 2.0 is the Merger of Sales and Marketing

In complex B2B sales, people still buy from people. I don’t want to give the impression that ‘Closing’ has gone away. It’s still extremely important, and the people who are ‘Closers’ are extremely valuable. More about this later.

Sales 2.0 merges Sales and Marketing to target prospects more effectively, using online technologies in innovative ways, to bring in more business at a significantly lower cost of sales. Information is available free (or close to it) today that you couldn’t buy for any amount of money five years ago.

Now we can find highly specific target prospects much more easily, AND we don’t have to interrupt them while they’re trying to do something else. Outbound sales messages, when they’re done via phone or even in person, are analogous to interruptive advertising. An Alterian poll determined that in 2009, 95% of advertising was ignored or disbelieved by its target audience. The old saw was that 50% of advertising didn’t work… you just didn’t know which 50%. Today, you can rest assured that 95% of advertising spend is wasted.

How do you build trust when your prospects won’t engage with you? Today’s B2B buyers want to engage in conversation where and when it’s convenient for them. That means social media. It’s not expensive, but it’s not free. It takes time and effort, knowledge and finesse. Increasingly, Sales and Marketing people are going to have to immerse themselves in social media (or hire a trusted resource) to do demand generation, lead nurturing and to build relationships… albeit digital relationships.

Now we get back to the ‘Closers’ I mentioned earlier. In B2B they’re essential, and they’re expensive. You don’t want them (and they wouldn’t do it anyway) spending time writing blogs, Tweeting, and trolling Discussion Groups on LinkedIn. The good news is they don’t have to. Once a digital relationship is established with a prospect, and the lead is qualified, whoever is handling social media for you should turn the realtionship/lead over to one of your closers. (You have at least one, or you wouldn’t be in business.) When the prospect is nearing a buy decision, they will want to speak with a sales person.

If the Sales 2.0/Marketing operation has done its job correctly, that face to face conversation won’t be focused exclusively on price. Your closer can spend their time and energy developing a personal relationship… and closing a profitable deal.

This is the first post in a series about B2B Sales 2.0. The next one will be titled ‘Sales 2.0 is Sales Enablement’.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

The Content, Connection, Conversation, Conversion Continuum

Wednesday, January 20th, 2010

I am officially retiring acSellerant’s tagline – “Relevant and useful information builds trust. Trust sells.” When I first came up with that slogan, I was on a mission to convince B2B companies that:

  1. traditional, interruptive advertising was no longer effective, and
  2. traditional presales activities (educating prospects about your solutions) had been replaced by Google.

Largely due to the efforts of others, like Joe Pulizzi and Newt Barrett; and to the overwhelming evidence in the market place, my prospects now understand #1 and 2 above. So what’s next?

The Content, Connection, Conversation, Conversion Continuum

We all agree that to engage prospects we need to produce and publish relevant, useful, interesting and valuable content. You can’t just put it out there anymore, though. There’s too much competition for peoples’ attention.

We need to connect the content to our prospects. That means we have to deliver it to the online places where they hang out. That might be at industry-related websites like MSPmentor, or on special interest groups within Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Once you’ve set your content at the feet of the people it was developed for, if you’ve made the content compelling enough, your prospects connect with you. You’ve piqued their interest and they want to learn more… or they want to voice their opinion. They will comment on a blog post, in your online discussion, or they’ll email you.

Conversation ensues.  When a dialogue is created between you and your prospects, ideas are exchanged. This is the time to listen carefully. It’s a golden opportunity to find out exactly what prospects want. Let them tell you. If they feel they’ve been heard, trust is built.

Once they understand that you truly have their best interest at heart, the conversation will move from online to phone, and then face to face, as the topics move from features and benefits, to pricing, and to terms and conditions. The prospect converts into a customer. You close a profitable deal without selling anything.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Insurance Technology Pundits

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

For those of you who own, manage or sell for IT companies that target insurers, I have a trio of blogs, and one trade publication, that you ought to be reading. It’s amazing the amount of free, yet valuable, information that’s available today on the web.

These three Insurance Technology pundits are Ellen Carney, Barry Rabkin and Ara Trembly. All three of these people make their living consulting to technology vendors in the insurance space. They are all well-connected in the industry, and they all have valuable insights.

Barry’s blog is called ‘Rabkin’s ROI – Rants, Observations and Insights from an Insurance Technology Analyst‘. Barry has a unique point of view as a result of 30 years of experience in what he calls the ‘InTech’ world.

Both Ellen and Ara have blogs on the Insurance Networking site. You may have to register to access the blogs, but it’s well worth the five minutes. You can also sign up to receive IN’s enewsletter. Lots of good information. Here’s an excellent post by Ellen listing the findings of a recent Forrester research study re how insurance execs are planning their IT spending; and an insightful one by Ara discussing the demise of homegrown insurance systems (or not).

These people are bona fide world class experts in the field of information technology in the insurance industry, and you can peek inside their brains for free! Relevant and useful information to help you make better business decisions. It’s a wonderful world.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Business to Business Lead Qualification

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

Getting to ‘No’

I remember my boss at Digital Equipment Corp. once awarded me the “bulldog”. It was a bronze casting of a bulldog meant to be proudly displayed on my desktop. It was recognition for sinking my teeth into an unqualified prospect and holding on until the prospect submitted to my will and bought.

Bulldog 150x150 Business to Business Lead QualificationThat was then. This is now. Today that kind of behavior should be punished, not rewarded. Maybe even back then. We made the sale, but at what cost?

Once I had committed to that deal, I spent tons of time booking appointments, preparing proposals, building presentations, and making customer visits. Very time consuming and expensive. I’ve since decided that this is work that should be done only if there’s a real need and a good chance of winning a profitable deal.

Everything you do to generate leads and close deals is hard work. Don’t waste it. Get to ‘No’.

There’s a substantial difference in your mental attitude when you’re going for a ‘Yes’ versus when you’re going for a ‘No’.

When you go for a ‘Yes’:

  • You’re trying to get an appointment.
  • You’re trying to get approval for your proposal.
  • You’re trying to close the deal or close for the next step.
  • Your posture is one of a supplicant.

When you go for a ‘No’:

  • You cross prospects off your list faster.
  • You never do proposals that have no chance of leading to a sale.
  • You’re looking for reasons not to waste time with loser deals.
  • Your posture is one of confidence that what you sell is of value.

This doesn’t mean you throw out every lead that isn’t perfect and ready to decide today.

What it does mean is that you prioritize your efforts, and you make prospects show you why they deserve your sales time and sales resources.

It’s so much better to deal only with qualified prospects. Prospects who have pain and are actively seeking help.

Most companies don’t qualify leads well enough. In B2B, prospects are professional buyers, with budgets and business problems to solve. If you can help them, chances are good they’ll buy. You have a right to ask questions to determine if the opportunity is appropriate for your organization.

When you embark on a demand generation program, you need to qualify the leads that come in. Initially, they should be qualified to determine whether they belong in the sales funnel at all. Criteria to determine this:

  • the prospect is the decision maker, a strong influencer, or has access to the decision maker or influencer
  • the company is doing well and can make money available for the purchase (or, in some cases, is doing poorly and may go to great lengths to get funding for the right project)
  • pain has been detected, and your product may solve their pain
  • they have expressed interest in your product, and
  • they project a purchase within a year.

If they don’t qualify at this point, discard them. On average, you’ll lose about 20% of the leads generated. You’ll save a lot of time and effort by not pursuing leads that will never close.

Then it’s time to qualify for “sales-ready” leads. It’s imperative that Marketing, Sales and the C-suite all agree on the criteria that must be met to qualify a lead as “sales-ready”. Here’s an example of sales-ready lead criteria:

  • the prospect is the decision maker, or is a strong influencer and can get you access to the decision maker
  • budget is available, or the person can make budget available
  • pain has been verified, and your product can genuinely solve their pain
  • they have expressed interest in a sales meeting to explore a solution to their need, and
  • they project a purchase within three months.

You can loosen or tighten the scoring criteria based on whether you want more or fewer leads to hand to your salesforce. On average, 20% of the leads generated will be qualified as sales-ready. Hand them off to the appropriate sales contacts immediately.

You’ve discarded 20% and handed 20% off to your salesforce. That means you have 60% of the leads generated still in the sales funnel. They’re qualified as leads, but they’re not sales-ready. They need to be nurtured.

The way to build a relationship with these prospects is to let them educate themselves. B2B lead nurturing consists of making informative content (some subset of whitepapers, seminars, case studies, podcasts, webinars, demos, etc.) available to the prospect. The goal is to earn their permission to stay in touch and progressively deepen the relationship so that when the prospect does become sales-ready, they’ll want to engage with your firm. You’re top of mind when they’re ready to buy, and the conversation won’t be centered on price, because you’ve become a trusted advisor.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Digital Relationships

Wednesday, June 24th, 2009

Business to Business Moves Online

It isn’t news to you that the nature of your relationships with your clients and prospects has changed. Existing relationships are more difficult to maintain as the people you used to deal with leave their posts, and their replacements (if there are any) are much less inclined to engage with IT providers. Cultivating new relationships is more difficult because prospects don’t feel the need to interact with IT providers until they’re ready to buy. They do their research online. If they contact you, the conversation will be about price.

Relationships

Relationships

What may be news is that there’s a more cost effective way to build, nurture and maintain relationships with clients and prospects. You don’t have to be in the same room (or the same country). You can build the trust online that forms the foundation of every sale. With one caveat – the relationships you build must be authentic. Everybody has a well-honed BS detector today. If you aren’t in it for the long haul, if you’re just trying to make your quarterly numbers, resign yourself to competing on price.

Return On Influence

There’s networking and relationship-building for business, and there’s ’sales disguised as networking’. Don’t confuse the two because your prospects won’t. The first one is truly helpful because he wants to make and keep relationships. The second one is interacting only to fill an immediate need.

By being helpful over time, even when there’s no imminent payoff on the horizon, you become a trusted advisor. And you’re able to accomplish this fairly easily, because it’s a one to many relationship. By communicating relevant and useful information through your blog (and commenting on other appropriate blogs), and/or a newsletter, white papers, videos, your website etc., you build a reputation. As long as the content you develop is high quality, people with an interest will find it and disseminate it to others.

Starved for Time, Not Information

It seems counter intuitive. Why develop more content when people don’t have time to consume the information that’s already available to them? If you develop content that resonates, or informs in a way that’s valuable, or entertains (or preferably, all three), people rightly perceive it as a time saver. They didn’t have to hunt down these tidbits, assimilate them and think them through – you did it for them.

Content Strategy

Of course, you can’t deliver useful, relevant, compelling information off the cuff. You must determine what your positioning is. What subject matter do you want to be the trusted advisor for? And who are your target prospects? Once that’s done, you can develop a content strategy that outlines the research you’ll do and the topics you’ll cover. An added bonus is that, as search becomes more contextual (see Bing, Kosmix and Duck Duck Go), your relevant content becomes your search engine optimization (SEO). No need to trick the search engines into driving traffic. The same valuable information that keeps people interested, will also draw the interest of the search engines.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF