Archive for the ‘execution’ Category

Using Social Media to Design New Products

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

I know that my clients (SMB B2B IT providers), amongst many others, need a better way to communicate to their prospects. acSellerant’s tag line is “Relevant and useful information builds trust. Trust sells.” While that still holds true, it’s not enough.Innovation Group 150x150 Using Social Media to Design New Products Not when it’s delivered primarily via text. The vast majority of B2B marketing messages are delivered online. People have a short attention span online

Relevant, useful, interesting… even entertaining copy is no longer enough to hold the interest of harried, starved for time, inundated with information business prospects. I’ve spent a lot of time and effort researching and building a process to develop multimedia storyboards that can deliver a significant amount of information in a short amount of time. The idea is to use sight and sound simultaneously to compress the amount of time, and increase the ease, in which information is communicated.

You’re thinking, “Wow, Bob. Alert the media. Ever hear of television or the movies?”

This process might include video, but it doesn’t have to, and it’s designed to be deliverable at less cost, with less equipment, and less prep time than video. It’s designed to fit the budgets of my clients. It’s untried, though.

So, I’ve been thinking about how to launch it. I first vetted the idea with friends, colleagues and clients over the holidays. Then I submitted discussions to a half dozen groups on LinkedIn. I was surprised at the response. Many smart, talented, creative professionals joined in the discussions. The consensus was, if I can pull it off, it’s a winner.

Then I went to three online custom publishers I have a relationship with. They were positive. They all said the same thing, they can sell it, IF I can pull it off. So now it’s time to develop a proof of concept and get feedback.

I’ve built a prototype with a voice over script, some on screen text, and a story told in cartoon format (with my crude stick figure drawings). I realized I needed a professional cartoonist to do the eight or nine frames necessary to tell the visual part of the story. So I’m using iFreelance and contacting other cartoonists I found on LinkedIn and through graphic designers I know.

So stay tuned. I’m going to blog about the process as I reveal the proof of concept online, try to build buzz via social media, and crowdsource tweaks to the process/product to improve it. By the way, one of the outcomes of the discussions on LinkedIn is a name for the product: acStream.

Should be interesting.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Product Launch SWAT Team

Monday, February 15th, 2010

My last blog post introduced this series focused on launching a new product or service totally online. Product Launch SWAT teams are essential whether the launch is online, offline, or a combination of the two.

If a new product or service is important enough to build a launch, give the launch the resources it needs to be successful. SWAT team members should include people from Marketing, Product Management, Sales and Service/Support. Expect that these people will be devoting significant time to the launch effort, so make sure that they aren’t encumbered with too many other deliverables in the same time frame. Assume that half of their time will be devoted to the launch for approximately three months.

It’s essential that Sales be involved in every product launch in a meaningful way. That means at least one sales person will have to split time between roles. Reduce their quota for the duration of the launch. If you don’t, they’ll be busy making their number. The launch process will suffer and the ROI of the launch will be compromised.

You’re going to be tempted to put a junior sales person on the team to minimize the revenue loss. Don’t do it. Put the sales exec who’s going to be most affected by the new product on the team. Typically that will be somebody more senior, and somebody who will whole-heartedly contribute to the success of the launch.

Bruce Seidel is a B2B sales coach with a long history of success selling software. He wrote an excellent blog post regarding formal agreements between Marketing and Sales to ensure a successful new product launch. Read it. Copy it. Keep it someplace safe where you can access it when you need it. I did.

My next post will be about using social media (your blog, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter) to crowdsource the features, benefits, delivery model – even the name and branding of your new product or service (and to start a whisper campaign about it).

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Why Online Product Launches are Different, Better, Cheaper

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

As it happens, I’m in the midst of strategizing and planning new product launches for two clients and a new service launch for acSellerant. I’ve done several launches over the years, but this is the first time I’m doing them exclusively online. Traditional launches keep things a secret until the big launch day, then ‘Kaboom!’, a media blitz… and it’s over. Unless it’s Apple. Then people will continue to buzz about the product for months.

Alas, you’re not Apple, and I’m not Steve Jobs. That doesn’t mean we can’t pull off highly successful product launches, though.

Due to the tools we have available today, the research phase (which is an absolute must) can be combined with test marketing and some early promotion of the product.

The problem in developing successful new products is not a shortage of ideas, but the expense of bringing a new product to market without any guarantee of success. How much better to continually seek feedback from prospects along the way, and fine tune the product so you know it’s going to be a winner.

Research, Research, Research

Social media platforms like LinkedIn and Twitter constitute mind-boggling tools for accomplishing research on the fly with built-in feedback loops, and rock bottom pricing. Five years ago you’d have to pay tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars for the information you can get at virtually zero cost today. Here’s the process:

  1. Determine who your best target customers are. “Everybody” is not an acceptable answer. Be as specific as possible. The better you know who you’re selling to, the better you can custom fit your product, and the more persuasive your marketing messages can be.
  2. Determine how you want to go to market. Are you going to produce the product in-house or outsource the production? Will you sell the product yourself or through resellers? If you’re going the partner route, thoroughly research potential partners to determine best fit.
  3. Market Research Phase:
    a. Research market size and potential.
    b. Interview end users, resellers and sales reps (you can do this via online polls on LinkedIn and Twitter, although you should also conduct some qualitative, in-depth interviews in person or over the phone).
  4. Analysis and Development of the Marketing Plan:
    a. Competitive Analysis – review competing products and how they stack up against your proposed product. If there aren’t any closely competing products, research how else people are solving the problem. If they aren’t solving the problem and they’re not suffering any pain, pull the plug. If they are suffering, but don’t realize they have a problem, you need to add in the overhead cost required to educate them.
    b. Evaluate the product’s Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT). Develop a Proof of Concept so people can understand what it is and what it does. It’s OK to use smoke and mirrors, as long as you can build the real functionality when the time comes.
    c. Develop an Online Marketing Plan that leverages the unique capabilities of the Net. Successful online launches create a series of interactions with current customers, employees, prospects, suppliers, trade media, resellers and any other appropriate audiences.
  5. Execute the Plan and Launch the Product:
    a. Develop online (easily and inexpensively edited) collateral materials.
    b. Begin placement dialogues with the first step in the preferred channel.
    c. Have enough dialogues with enough different entities to uncover any previously undiscovered objections.
    d. Review and revise the Plan as necessary with the new information.
    e. Repeat until you’re satisfied you have market acceptance.
    f. Explore relationship extensions with partners.

I’ll come out with more details in shorter blog posts over the next several days.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

How Do You Communicate Value in a Digital World?

Wednesday, December 2nd, 2009

A client said something to me last week that I want to share with you. He asked me, “How do we communicate value in a digital world?” I asked him what he meant.

He said,  “Our services are virtual. We remotely monitor our customers’ systems and applications, and we fix things before they break. We used to get to play the hero now and then… swooping in when there was trouble and saving the day. How can we communicate that kind of value when we’re invisible?”Business Man Questioning

I know the answer, and I’ll share it with you in a minute.

On an earlier visit to that same office, I was asked to wait in the reception area for a few minutes until my client (the VP of Sales) was finished with a con call. So I sat and checked my phone, etc. I couldn’t help overhearing a conversation coming through the open door of their Help Desk area. One of the technician’s was busy relating how he had ‘helped’ a recent caller. She had phoned with a question that this technician considered “stupid”. He recounted (to the amusement of his peers) the conversation during which he solved the problem… and humiliated the caller.

At the time, I decided it wasn’t my place to mention this to my client; but his question was the perfect opening.

How do you communicate value in a digital world?

You make damn sure that every customer touch point is pleasant and reassuring. That Help Desk call was an opportunity for the technician to establish rapport, help the woman with her problem, and make her feel important. She is important. Her company is paying that technician’s salary.

I can divide my clients into two categories. Those who realize that so-called ‘soft skills’ are just as important as technical skills, and those who don’t. Guess who’s more successful?

If you’re remote, and your customer touch points are limited to an occasional phone call, an email now and then, and your website; make the phone conversations, emails and website as high quality as you can. Make them the Ritz-Carlton of phone conversations, emails and websites. If they’re the Holiday Inn Express of phone conversations, emails and websites, that’s how your clients will perceive your business, no matter how sophisticated and skilled your people are.

Evaluate your entire business. Look at every customer touch point and make sure that the employee (or digital entity) involved is not only technically competent, but is delivering Ritz-Carlton level service.

When that’s fixed, start (and maintain) a social media campaign. That’s how you develop digital relationships. More on that in future posts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Why Content Strategy is So Important

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Seth Godin said, “Content marketing is the only marketing that works for B2B.” I absolutely agree. I see proof of it all the time. One can conclude then that content is important. How content is developed, organized and disseminated is also important.

Years ago your Sales department controlled every step of a prospect’s movement through the sales cycle – from initial interest to closing the deal. Your salespeople managed the prospect’s access to information about your products and services. Marketing’s job largely consisted of renting assets owned by other entitiesInformation Structure (advertising sales departments, PR firms with access to journalists, tradeshow organizers).

The internet has changed that forever. Fragmentation of media has created an information source explosion:

  • happy and disgruntled customers freely comment about vendors and services,
  • self-proclaimed industry experts blog about everything from features to pricing to future product releases,
  • competitors engage prospects online via the clever use of social media.

The days of controlling the conversation with customers and prospects are gone. Marketing must move from renting assets to building them. Marketers must become publishers.

Content in Context

The internet has disintermediated the middlemen. Used to be that Marketing ‘rented’ access to prospects via print advertising in trade publications. We all know that ads don’t work anymore. People have become inured. They ignore the ‘noise’.

Or Marketing rented access to prospects via articles placed in those same trade pubs. This can still work, but is prohibitively expensive for SMB companies. Compared with 10 years ago, the prices are higher and the readership is lower.

Trade shows can still work, but they too are expensive, and they’re time-consuming. Most SMB IT providers are selective about exhibiting at trade shows, and only do one or two a year.

The internet has given us direct access to prospects. We don’t have to go through those middlemen anymore. But there’s a downside. Those middlemen gave us context.

When buying a print ad, Marketing made sure that the readers of that trade pub were people in a position to buy what they were selling; and made sure that the ‘content’ of that ad spoke in terms that made sense to that target audience.

When a PR agency placed an article, the agency made sure that the placement was appropriate and that the content was relevant. Then a professional journalist wrote the article in a way that was (usually) interesting to the target audience.

In the trade show scenario, organizers demand that exhibitors meet certain criteria… that they’re focused on a niche that’s congruent with the target audience. Then they book speakers and seminars designed to attract that target audience. And they promote the show to ensure the targets attend.

Content Strategy Supplies Context

Content strategy plans for the creation, publication, and governance of relevant and useful content across a number of different vehicles (blogs, case studies, email campaigns, LinkedIn, online PR, podcasts, syndicated articles, videos, webinars, websites, white papers, etc.).

Gaining the interest of customers and prospects online is all about being willing to put your own agenda aside. Put yourself in their shoes and work hard to produce information that prospects find relevant and useful. If you can make it entertaining too – so much the better. Companies need not only the will, talent and skill to produce great content; they need the tools, processes and infrastructure. Those went away when we lost the middlemen.

The people who develop online content discuss user experience, information architecture, content management systems, metadata, visual design, user research and other disciplines that facilitate users’ abilities to find and consume content. What’s been largely ignored is the content development process.

Content Development Process

Content strategy is important. It provides the context for the content that forms the heart and soul of every successful B2B marketing effort. Content strategy deserves the focus of either someone internal to the organization, or by an external agency. A content strategist executes:

  • Channel Distribution Strategy – defining how and where content will be made available to prospects. (e.g. blogs, email marketing, LinkedIn, online article publishing, podcasts, posted videos, Twitter, website).
  • Content Management Strategy – defining the technologies needed to capture, store, deliver, and preserve an organization’s content. Publishing infrastructures, content management systems and workflows are key considerations.

  • Editorial Strategy – defining the guidelines by which all online content is governed: values, voice, tone, legal and regulatory concerns, user-generated content, and so on.

  • Keyword Research – using search term suggestion tools (on an ongoing basis) to determine which keywords and phrases people are using to find what you’re selling, and embedding those keywords in your content.
  • Link Building – an important component for superior search engine ranking. Google bestows high ranking on those websites that have been linked to from sites it considers to be “of high quality and relevance”.

  • Search Engine Optimization - editing and organizing the content on a page or across a website to increase its relevance and search engine ranking for specific keyphrases.
  • Stewardship of Company Positioning - ensuring all messages are congruent with the established brand, value propositions, etc. and adapting them as markets or competitive conditions change.

Businesses must commit to treating their marketing content as a valuable asset worthy of strategic planning. Otherwise content marketing efforts are haphazard and less effective than they could be. Anything worth doing is worth doing well. Content strategy is worth doing well.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

35,000 Feet to Street Level w/ Sales Enablement

Sunday, October 25th, 2009

A week ago I attended an event put on by one of my clients. A ‘Global VP’ from a multinational IT mega corporation was flown in to speak to a room full of executive clients and prospects. The topic was Business Intelligence, so I was looking forward to it. I was disappointed. It was overly long and complex.

It reminded me about the disconnect between large vendor Marketing and the sales messaging needed by SMB MSPs, SIs and VARs. That VP had a slick PowerPoint presentation developed by a corporate Marketing department. It leveraged information purchased from major IT research vendors – Forrester, Gartner, IDC, etc. It was a good starting point, but almost worthless to sales people on the ground trying to sell specific solutions.

Sales Enablement is the process of arming an organization’s salespeople with information that will help to close profitable deals. Sales Enablement delivers the most relevant information for a specific sales situation.

Sales people are what I call “just in time learners”. They are extremely busy. They are action-oriented. They have little patience for sitting, reading and digesting reams of information so they can later distill and communicate the most significant message for a particular sales situation. Salespeople learn what they need to know when they need to know it. Sales Enablement should bridge the gap between the 35,000 foot PowerPoint and the, “I’m sitting across the table from a decision maker who is willing to take the next step… if I can show her that we are capable of solving her specific business problem.”

The specificity need not be deeply detailed, but it should address the particular problem… not describe issues that are universal across an industry. It should bridge Sales and Marketing departments. It should augment market research and global messaging with:

  • Competitive Intelligence – not at the vendor level, but of local MSPs, SIs and VARs
  • Tribal knowledge – specific to the client industry in the local geography
  • Product knowledge from the minds of the technologists who have developed/integrated similar solutions, and
  • Answers to questions and objections encountered by salespeople who have sold similar solutions in that market.Sales Guy with Projector

Here are three common mistakes salespeople make when attempting to bridge the gaps described above:

Mistake #1: Giving the Feature/Benefit World Tour

These tours often happen during demos, presentations, proposals, and in printed and online collateral. They’re an attempt to show prospects everything that your product/service/solution can deliver. Don’t give the ‘List of the Top Ten Features and Benefits’. Your website should have that information. When in front of a customer you want to pick the two or three features and benefits that are meaningful to them given their situation.

A savvy sales enablement provider will help the salesperson pick the three most relevant features and benefits, and will translate them into higher-order value statements. As an example, the three most relevant value statements for an Electronic Records Management solution might be:

  1. A 25% increase in productivity due to improved access to information for daily tasks.
  2. An average 40% savings on paper storage costs.
  3. A 99% reduction in fines and penalties due to regulatory non-compliance.

If you know that all three of those are primary concerns with that prospect, you’ve just reduced your sales cycle significantly.

Mistake #2: Let Me Tell You All About My Baby

This happens most often when an engineer is brought along on a sales call. They are (usually justifiably) proud of their baby. They built it, and they love to talk about it… what it does, how it does it, why it does it this way, and so forth ad nauseum. There’s a time and a place for this conversation – when your techie is talking to their techie. When that occurs, it’s usually quite late in the buying process and the business people have already decided to go ahead.

Don’t throw the baby out with the bath water, though. Summarize the solution effectively (and briefly) using graphics, then provide a link or a white paper which details the technical information. Your decision maker will be more at ease if he can give those details to his trusted technical advisor.

Mistake #3: No Proof Points… Just Trust Me

This is a situation that’s as old as B2B technology sales itself. Salespeople understand the effectiveness of case studies and testimonials. They constantly ask for them. But they never want to take the time to elicit them from clients. Your salespeople, and your technicians and customer service reps too, should be alert for positive statements from clients. When clients make these statements, the automatic response should be, “Thank you. We’d love to be able to use that in our promotional materials. Can I have someone contact you about it?” Then, whoever is handling your Sales Enablement should quickly follow up with a written testimonial, or if appropriate, an outline for a case study, for their approval. Don’t wait for the client to write it. It won’t happen.

Also be alert for situations where your solution has made a hero out of someone in the client organization. Those people will be happy to sit down with your Sales Enabler and tell them all about the problem that was solved, and how it came about, and the results achieved. Case studies with a client hero or heroine resonate with prospects. After all, who doesn’t want to be seen as a hero by their company?

Consider incenting everyone who has client contact to submit potential testimonials and case studies.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Marketing Defined

Friday, August 28th, 2009

Let me preface by saying this isn’t a textbook definition of ‘Marketing’. It isn’t how the American Marketing Association, or Proctor & Gamble, or even Apple would define it. This is Bob Leonard’s definition of ‘Marketing’ developed over many years of learning what works best for my clients – small to medium sized (SMB), information technology (hardware, software and/or services), business to business (B2B) companies.

Marketing Sign PostBrand communicates the ‘personality’ of the company and its products and services. Some people mistakenly believe that brand must be communicated through advertising and other promotional activities. Not!

The C suite should define and communicate what a company is about, so employees understand and transmit the brand message. ‘Brand’ is communicated through all customer and prospect touch points.

I define Marketing as “anything that helps Sales close profitable deals”. Branding is a part of that, but only a part. It’s an input to the process of Marketing.

Marketing can be used as a tool to help management develop market strategies (for each product/service) – which are built upon detailed descriptions of target prospects. Once we know exactly who will buy each product and service, and why, we can determine the best

  • messaging (benefit statements, value propositions, etc.)
  • offers (what will make them take action?)
  • vehicles (the most effective ways, online or off, to reach them).

Marketing can inject discipline into the Sales process. It can force the development of a strategy, plan and budget that eliminate one-off, shoot from the hip promotional efforts that do nothing to increase profitable business.

Marketing is a process that is composed of many parts. When conceived and executed properly, the return on investment is significant. Marketing is the planting of a seed, and the nurturing of that seed over time. Just as a farmer must water, weed and feed for months before reaping the benefits, Marketing takes time.

Marketing exists because Sales, by nature and due to compensation plans that reward short-term results, is unable or unwilling to perform that nurturing process. They just don’t have the time. Optimal results are achieved when Sales and Marketing work together. When each:

  • understands what the other is doing and why,
  • agrees on who is responsible for what, and
  • can clearly articulate a mutual definition of a ‘qualified lead’.

Marketing performs demand generation activities, and hands off warm, engaged leads to Sales when the time is right. Sales can then spend its time nurturing relationships with current customers to deliver upsells and repeat business; and developing and closing profitable deals with qualified leads.

Over time, I’ve devised a methodology for developing and executing effective ‘Marketing’ for my clients. The basic format is: ‘Strategy. Content. Design. Tools/Vehicles. Test/Optimize.’ More in upcoming posts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Interview with EVP at Safeguard Guaranty

Thursday, July 16th, 2009

Ken Fries and I worked together a long time ago in Agency Automation at Aetna in Hartford. I left for Boston and Digital Equipment Corp. Ken stayed in Hartford and stayed in the insurance industry. His resume includes stints as the Vice President of Agency Strategy, eBusiness and Technology at The Hartford, an independent agency owner (he bought, built up and sold the agency over a five year period), AVP of Project Management & Efficiencies at Mass Mutual; and today he’s EVP of startup insurer Safeguard Guaranty. He knows as much about the state of technology deployment in the insurance industry as just about anybody on the planet.

So I gave him a call.

Bob:  Customer knowledge across lines of business has been an issue since we worked together at Aetna all those years ago. When I went to Digital, it was an issue we tried to address with data warehouses. Then, years later at EMC when I was the Insurance Industry Marketing Manager, we tried to address it with CRM and Enterprise Storage Networks. Is customer knowledge across lines of business still the holy grail for insurers?

Ken:  Maybe not considered to be the holy grail, but still very, very important in many different aspects.  First and foremost is the data. I believe, as do many companies, that data is still king. It indicates past performance of customers and predicts future traits in terms of buying patterns, needs, claims modeling and rate setting for pricing of products. Literally as we speak, Travelers is doing some heavy spending on data analytics and modeling based off this data. I have never seen an insurance company to date making such a tremendous commitment to acquiring and analyzing the data as they are currently doing.

Bob:  How is Safeguard Guaranty solving this issue?

Ken:  Well, we’re lucky in that we have no legacy systems to deal with. We’re putting systems in place that can truly capture customer data in an Enterprise fashion versus traditional segmented type systems by line of business or market segment.

Bob:  Do you think insurance industry executives are finally ready to tackle this beast?

Ken:  Certain firms like Travelers, Progressive and Geico are definitely committed to this, but many of the others are not yet prepared from a human resource/expertise perspective to understand the value of solving this issue… let alone ready to commit the substantial dollars needed to resolve it. They won’t do it, until the reality of losing their market share to companies like Travelers, Progressive and Geico hits them smack between the eyes.

So, it’s still an issue in much of the industry, and in Ken’s perspective, vendors need to educate their insurance clients on the competitive dangers they face, and the potential solutions available.

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

New Bank Card Regulations Affect IT Shops

Tuesday, June 30th, 2009

I’ve reprinted an article from the July issue of Bank Technology News below. The author, Rebecca Sausner, writes that the new US regulations on credit card companies will eat up most of these companies’ IT budgets over the next couple of years. This is good news for ‘body shops’ who will benefit because internal IT shops at these banks will be overwhelmed trying to rewrite their applications to comply with the new regulations.

IT vendors who supply more innovative Card Company solutions will see their projects sidelined for the next 12 to 18 months. Opportunity always accompanies change, though. Innovative IT providers should study these new regulations and attempt to partner with the Card Companies on applications that can help them comply while also adding customer service functionality.

COMPLIANCE

Card Co’s Day of Reckoning Hits IT

Bank Technology News  |  July 2009

by Rebecca Sausner

The new federal regulations overhauling credit card industry practices seemed radical, until President Obama signed a law in May that upped the ante in terms of timing and restrictions, and then in June proposed the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. Either alone represent a sea change for card lenders, requiring them, as the American Bankers Association puts it, “to overhaul their entire business models, eliminate specific practices, and reconstruct the way they extend credit and interact with customers.”

“Overhauling” and “reconstructing” have technology implications, but not always good ones. What will happen with the proposed new regulator is unknown – every bank lobby in the country opposes the idea. But the card law is a done deal, and represents such a major short-term challenge for lenders’ technology operations that one banker told MasterCard Advisors that compliance could absorb as much as 70 percent of the coming year’s IT resources at his institution. Everything from customer service technologies, billing and payment processing systems, disclosure processes, and pricing models must all be rewritten or replaced. Best guess is that most lenders will band-aid existing systems to meet the deadline – or face stiff fines – and overhaul down the road. “When you combine that the changes affect every part of the process, and when every part of the process involves technology, it’s going to be a drastic and very burdensome thing for IT departments,” says Michael Brauneis, director of regulatory risk consulting at Protiviti.

Certain provisions require entirely new processes to be added to the customer information file. Among them is the requirement that consumers opt-in to the product feature that allows them to pay a fee in order to exceed their available credit limit. For this, banks will have to build permissions functionality. Some institutions are looking at ways to comply without losing revenue. One solution: instant opt-in via a text message sent to a consumer at the point of sale. “They’re looking for something that could realistically be done so that it will be legal and consumers will accept the charge for the over-the-limit transaction,” says Greg Hedges, managing director at Protiviti.

The changes in how card issuers can utilize delinquency and other information to adjust credit availability will also be onerous, requiring that the links between the risk analysis and servicing side of the system be revamped. “I think it would drive even more the move towards more flexible technology where you could have three pricing tiers or have thousands,” says Dennis Dixon, president of Zoot Enterprise.

The new law may also “serve to wash a lot of the innovation that’s existed in the market out of the market,” Hedges says. “Organizations that had very sophisticated risk-based pricing, who started to look at consumer behavior, are trying to look at how they can keep those practices in place and still stay in compliance.” And for some, the rules may be too much to handle. “I strongly believe a lot of the smaller firms are just going to exit the business,” Brauneis says, adding the understatement of the week, “It’s already less attractive than it was a few years ago.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF

Finally Time for Insurers to Develop Comprehensive Views of Clients

Friday, June 26th, 2009

Adapting to the new economic and regulatory realities requires some new thinking on the part of insurance executives. It’s always easier for them to continue using legacy systems without any significant changes. In times like these, however, change is needed. There’s a considerable amount of research predicting that insurance industry IT budgets will increase in the remainder of 2009.  This is a good sign for the industry’s future, and for vendors selling hardware, software and services to the industry.

Research shows that insurance industry executives are more likely to seek advice from technology vendors than their counterparts in banking and most other industries. I haven’t seen any convincing arguments regarding why this is the case; but anecdotal evidence from our clients supports it.

A recurring theme in media predictions and analysts’ research is that insurers are investing in better underwriting and improved risk management. These offer good and necessary improvements, but only on the tactical level, i.e. incremental improvements in efficiency.

Technology providers ought to focus on changing the way insurers operate strategically and help them to place greater emphasis on customer lifetime value. It requires some creativity and a change of mindset. It’s amazing to me that this is still an issue. Twenty years ago, when I was in Digital Equipment Corp.’s Insurance Industry Consulting Practice, we were addressing ways (mostly data warehouses) of building 360 degree views of insurers’ clients across lines of business.

It may be that, given the current environment, insurers are finally feeling enough pain to take the steps necessary to  increase value and profitability by better knowing their customers. It takes more than just a vision to make things happen, though, especially with such a high level of uncertainty in the air.

I’d like to hear from insurance executives, research pundits and IT providers out there:

  1. Is customer knowledge across lines of business still the holy grail for insurers?
  2. How are you solving this issue?
  3. Do you think insurance industry executives are finally ready to tackle this beast?
Share and Enjoy:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Ping.fm
  • RSS
  • Sphinn
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Twitter
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF