Archive for August, 2009

Marketing Defined

Friday, August 28th, 2009

Let me preface by saying this isn’t a textbook definition of ‘Marketing’. It isn’t how the American Marketing Association, or Proctor & Gamble, or even Apple would define it. This is Bob Leonard’s definition of ‘Marketing’ developed over many years of learning what works best for my clients – small to medium sized (SMB), information technology (hardware, software and/or services), business to business (B2B) companies.

Marketing Sign Post 150x150 Marketing DefinedBrand communicates the ‘personality’ of the company and its products and services. Some people mistakenly believe that brand must be communicated through advertising and other promotional activities. Not!

The C suite should define and communicate what a company is about, so employees understand and transmit the brand message. ‘Brand’ is communicated through all customer and prospect touch points.

I define Marketing as “anything that helps Sales close profitable deals”. Branding is a part of that, but only a part. It’s an input to the process of Marketing.

Marketing can be used as a tool to help management develop market strategies (for each product/service) – which are built upon detailed descriptions of target prospects. Once we know exactly who will buy each product and service, and why, we can determine the best

  • messaging (benefit statements, value propositions, etc.)
  • offers (what will make them take action?)
  • vehicles (the most effective ways, online or off, to reach them).

Marketing can inject discipline into the Sales process. It can force the development of a strategy, plan and budget that eliminate one-off, shoot from the hip promotional efforts that do nothing to increase profitable business.

Marketing is a process that is composed of many parts. When conceived and executed properly, the return on investment is significant. Marketing is the planting of a seed, and the nurturing of that seed over time. Just as a farmer must water, weed and feed for months before reaping the benefits, Marketing takes time.

Marketing exists because Sales, by nature and due to compensation plans that reward short-term results, is unable or unwilling to perform that nurturing process. They just don’t have the time. Optimal results are achieved when Sales and Marketing work together. When each:

  • understands what the other is doing and why,
  • agrees on who is responsible for what, and
  • can clearly articulate a mutual definition of a ‘qualified lead’.

Marketing performs demand generation activities, and hands off warm, engaged leads to Sales when the time is right. Sales can then spend its time nurturing relationships with current customers to deliver upsells and repeat business; and developing and closing profitable deals with qualified leads.

Over time, I’ve devised a methodology for developing and executing effective ‘Marketing’ for my clients. The basic format is: ‘Strategy. Content. Design. Tools/Vehicles. Test/Optimize.’ More in upcoming posts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined
  • services sprite Marketing Defined

What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management

Friday, August 21st, 2009

There’s a massive opportunity available for vendors serving banks and insurance companies. Many regulations have been passed in recent years, and there’s more on the way. Regulatory compliance is a significant issue facing not only banks and insurers, but all corporations. The complexity and diversity of information that must be retained and remain retrievable has multiplied. The amount of unstructured content that must be archived is growing exponentially, and is often crucial for regulatory compliance. Much of that information never makes it to paper. It’s in the form of MP3 podcasts, videos, emails and online text like this blog post.Drowning in Paper 150x150 What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management

The larger players have already instituted records management policies to get a handle on all the information that is created and maintained throughout the corporation. Mid-sized and smaller players are now realizing that risk has grown in both magnitude and consequence.

Businesses are now held liable not just for security breaches, but also for protecting customer information. Without a sound, uniform, comprehensive records management policy, information can’t be stored or archived consistently. That makes retrieval for business, compliance and legal requirements costly, time-consuming and inefficient.

Given ever-increasing litigation, investigations and regulatory actions coupled with the explosive growth of electronic records, automation of a corporation’s records management policies, processes and business practices is no longer an option; it’s a necessity.

If you’re a Managed Services Provider, and you aren’t offering electronic records management (ERM) solutions, you ought to look into it immediately. The need is real, the technology is proven and affordable (ROI is typically less than 24 months). The difficulty will be in convincing prospects that you can deliver not only the system, but that you understand their business and can help them implement more productive workflow processes, increase productivity, and reduce information management costs. Much more on that in future posts.

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management
  • services sprite What Every MSP Ought to Know About Electronic Records Management

Insurance Technology Pundits

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

For those of you who own, manage or sell for IT companies that target insurers, I have a trio of blogs, and one trade publication, that you ought to be reading. It’s amazing the amount of free, yet valuable, information that’s available today on the web.

These three Insurance Technology pundits are Ellen Carney, Barry Rabkin and Ara Trembly. All three of these people make their living consulting to technology vendors in the insurance space. They are all well-connected in the industry, and they all have valuable insights.

Barry’s blog is called ‘Rabkin’s ROI – Rants, Observations and Insights from an Insurance Technology Analyst‘. Barry has a unique point of view as a result of 30 years of experience in what he calls the ‘InTech’ world.

Both Ellen and Ara have blogs on the Insurance Networking site. You may have to register to access the blogs, but it’s well worth the five minutes. You can also sign up to receive IN’s enewsletter. Lots of good information. Here’s an excellent post by Ellen listing the findings of a recent Forrester research study re how insurance execs are planning their IT spending; and an insightful one by Ara discussing the demise of homegrown insurance systems (or not).

These people are bona fide world class experts in the field of information technology in the insurance industry, and you can peek inside their brains for free! Relevant and useful information to help you make better business decisions. It’s a wonderful world.

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits
  • services sprite Insurance Technology Pundits

Business to Business Lead Qualification

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

Getting to ‘No’

I remember my boss at Digital Equipment Corp. once awarded me the “bulldog”. It was a bronze casting of a bulldog meant to be proudly displayed on my desktop. It was recognition for sinking my teeth into an unqualified prospect and holding on until the prospect submitted to my will and bought.

Bulldog 150x150 Business to Business Lead QualificationThat was then. This is now. Today that kind of behavior should be punished, not rewarded. Maybe even back then. We made the sale, but at what cost?

Once I had committed to that deal, I spent tons of time booking appointments, preparing proposals, building presentations, and making customer visits. Very time consuming and expensive. I’ve since decided that this is work that should be done only if there’s a real need and a good chance of winning a profitable deal.

Everything you do to generate leads and close deals is hard work. Don’t waste it. Get to ‘No’.

There’s a substantial difference in your mental attitude when you’re going for a ‘Yes’ versus when you’re going for a ‘No’.

When you go for a ‘Yes’:

  • You’re trying to get an appointment.
  • You’re trying to get approval for your proposal.
  • You’re trying to close the deal or close for the next step.
  • Your posture is one of a supplicant.

When you go for a ‘No’:

  • You cross prospects off your list faster.
  • You never do proposals that have no chance of leading to a sale.
  • You’re looking for reasons not to waste time with loser deals.
  • Your posture is one of confidence that what you sell is of value.

This doesn’t mean you throw out every lead that isn’t perfect and ready to decide today.

What it does mean is that you prioritize your efforts, and you make prospects show you why they deserve your sales time and sales resources.

It’s so much better to deal only with qualified prospects. Prospects who have pain and are actively seeking help.

Most companies don’t qualify leads well enough. In B2B, prospects are professional buyers, with budgets and business problems to solve. If you can help them, chances are good they’ll buy. You have a right to ask questions to determine if the opportunity is appropriate for your organization.

When you embark on a demand generation program, you need to qualify the leads that come in. Initially, they should be qualified to determine whether they belong in the sales funnel at all. Criteria to determine this:

  • the prospect is the decision maker, a strong influencer, or has access to the decision maker or influencer
  • the company is doing well and can make money available for the purchase (or, in some cases, is doing poorly and may go to great lengths to get funding for the right project)
  • pain has been detected, and your product may solve their pain
  • they have expressed interest in your product, and
  • they project a purchase within a year.

If they don’t qualify at this point, discard them. On average, you’ll lose about 20% of the leads generated. You’ll save a lot of time and effort by not pursuing leads that will never close.

Then it’s time to qualify for “sales-ready” leads. It’s imperative that Marketing, Sales and the C-suite all agree on the criteria that must be met to qualify a lead as “sales-ready”. Here’s an example of sales-ready lead criteria:

  • the prospect is the decision maker, or is a strong influencer and can get you access to the decision maker
  • budget is available, or the person can make budget available
  • pain has been verified, and your product can genuinely solve their pain
  • they have expressed interest in a sales meeting to explore a solution to their need, and
  • they project a purchase within three months.

You can loosen or tighten the scoring criteria based on whether you want more or fewer leads to hand to your salesforce. On average, 20% of the leads generated will be qualified as sales-ready. Hand them off to the appropriate sales contacts immediately.

You’ve discarded 20% and handed 20% off to your salesforce. That means you have 60% of the leads generated still in the sales funnel. They’re qualified as leads, but they’re not sales-ready. They need to be nurtured.

The way to build a relationship with these prospects is to let them educate themselves. B2B lead nurturing consists of making informative content (some subset of whitepapers, seminars, case studies, podcasts, webinars, demos, etc.) available to the prospect. The goal is to earn their permission to stay in touch and progressively deepen the relationship so that when the prospect does become sales-ready, they’ll want to engage with your firm. You’re top of mind when they’re ready to buy, and the conversation won’t be centered on price, because you’ve become a trusted advisor.

Share and Enjoy:
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification
  • services sprite Business to Business Lead Qualification